Climate Change

Oil giants back carbon taxing measures

The biggest oil giants in the world, including ExxonMobil, Shell, BP and Total have announced their support to tax carbon dioxide emissions.

Revealing their support for the Climate Leadership Council, senior Republican figures proposed a $40 fee on each tonne of CO2 emitted in February.

The tax could raise between $200 billion and $300 billion a year and would in effect replace President Obama’s Clean Power Plan.

Founding members of the council include James Baker III and George Shultz, who served as Secretaries of State under George H. W. Bush and Ronald Reagan respectively, alongside Michael Bloomberg, Stephen Hawking, and former Walmart chairman Rob Walton.

In recent months President Trump has moved away from climate action with EPA administrator rolling back a number of rules regarding the regulation of emissions.

On Tuesday Shultz and former Secretary of the Treasury, Larry Summers, wrote that the United States needs to now find another way to tackle the issues.

They wrote that, “we do not believe the American people will for long wish to stand apart from the global effort to limit the damage from climate change.”

Andrew Steer, President and CEO of the World Resources Institute (WRI) praised the policy and said that:

A $40 price per ton on carbon, rising in a predictable way, could be the centrepiece of US action and leadership on climate.

“In bringing together major companies with prominent thinkers and policy experts across the political spectrum in support of this proposal, the CLC is delivering a clear message to elected officials in Washington: putting a price on carbon is a powerful tool for unleashing markets to strengthen the US economy and rapidly reduce carbon emissions.

“President Trump and Congress would do well to heed these voices and put in place policies like the CLC proposal to achieve these twin goals.”

Although the support from oil companies has been welcomed by many, others have stated that the support should not let them off for previous pollution and historical political meddling in the quashing of environmental laws.

Naomi Ages from Greenpeace said in conversation with ThinkProgress:

Buried in pages of supposedly ‘free market’ solutions is a new regulation exempting polluters from facing legal consequences for their role in fuelling climate change.

“ExxonMobil will try to dress this up as climate activism, but its key agenda is protecting executives from legal accountability for climate pollution and fraud.”

Indeed, in an annual meeting at ExxonMobil its entire board voted against the resolution of disclosing its climate risks, while the vote of shareholders voted in favour.

Andy has worked as a freelance journalist for a number of years and has been published in some of the UK’s top newspapers. He is now the editor Commercial Waste Magazine and contributes to a large selection of headlines and blog articles on the site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *